hey everyone, just to let you know, I've ditched this blogspot deal and moved my blog over to my new domain HERE
So please update your whatevers accordingly, as I will only be posting from there from now on.
<33333333 M
Jul 24, 2009
Jul 21, 2009
Up from the streets of Agrestic/bitch you don't wanna sweat this
So after watching many, many episodes of Project Runway, I've decided I'd like to attempt sewing some type of garment. And, since I don't have a sewing machine and can't afford to buy one, I'm going to try to do the whole thing by hand. I figure it can't be any harder than knitting something, and would actually probably be a lot easier in a number of ways. It'll take some time, but if I can do it I'd like to be able to work at it and maybe I can eventually make a lot of my clothes from scratch. Obviously by that time I'd get a sewing machine though.
I found these great videos online where this woman teaches you all the basic stitches and everything. Very cute and easy to follow. Good website too, there's a lot of different instructional videos on there.
On the less self-improving side of things, I've recently become increasingly worried about my memory. Now...my memory has always been bad, in the sense that I can never remember people's names or details for a very long time, but these days it seems to be getting much worse. Today I went to an FAC meeting and everyone laughed when I had to ask them to remind me why Zak wasn't our treasurer anymore, even though this only happened a few months ago and everyone else could remember perfectly. I'm still kind of hazy about it, even after they explained it. It was pretty funny, but at the same time its just one instance in a series of similar events that have me pretty worried. It's getting to the point now where I can't complete a series of full sentences without having to stop and ask the person I'm talking to what word I mean to use. And not complicated words either. For the past year or so I've really been struggling with writing, mostly because I can't remember how to write. By that I mean that I can't remember, as I'm writing, what I mean to say. I will get halfway through a sentence and have to stop and think again, and often I can never remember what I meant to write. And then I'll get confused about the whole thing, and not understand what I'm trying to say. I've also noticed that my reading comprehension has pretty much plummeted. I'll watch TV shows, and I can't remember who the main characters are from the previous season, sometimes even if they appear in the current season.
The most annoying part has to be forgetting words. And it probably scares me the most. I think for most people this would seem like no big deal, but with my family history I have to admit it's starting to bother me a lot. My mom has MS, and my whole life she's had a really bad memory. So I automatically associate the two things. While MS is not hereditary, you are more likely to get it if your siblings or parents have it. My mother's brother also has it, and possibly even my mother's sister. So, it's certainly on my mind. However, with all of that said, I'm probably more worried about the fact that temporary memory loss is also associated with lupus. I've technically all but been diagnosed with this disease, but due to the nature of it, it's pretty difficult to pin down. It's a sort of "sister" disease to MS, but its also known to be a disease that mimics many of the symptoms of other diseases and therefore has a huge variety of symptoms. I do have a whole bunch of them, including the "butterfly rash" on my face which drives me crazy. But...I think my mom being so concerned about my health when I was young made me wary of going to the doctor about almost anything. I always feel like I'm being a total hypochrodriac. But with my memory obviously getting worse, I'm starting to wonder if I should rethink that.
I found these great videos online where this woman teaches you all the basic stitches and everything. Very cute and easy to follow. Good website too, there's a lot of different instructional videos on there.
On the less self-improving side of things, I've recently become increasingly worried about my memory. Now...my memory has always been bad, in the sense that I can never remember people's names or details for a very long time, but these days it seems to be getting much worse. Today I went to an FAC meeting and everyone laughed when I had to ask them to remind me why Zak wasn't our treasurer anymore, even though this only happened a few months ago and everyone else could remember perfectly. I'm still kind of hazy about it, even after they explained it. It was pretty funny, but at the same time its just one instance in a series of similar events that have me pretty worried. It's getting to the point now where I can't complete a series of full sentences without having to stop and ask the person I'm talking to what word I mean to use. And not complicated words either. For the past year or so I've really been struggling with writing, mostly because I can't remember how to write. By that I mean that I can't remember, as I'm writing, what I mean to say. I will get halfway through a sentence and have to stop and think again, and often I can never remember what I meant to write. And then I'll get confused about the whole thing, and not understand what I'm trying to say. I've also noticed that my reading comprehension has pretty much plummeted. I'll watch TV shows, and I can't remember who the main characters are from the previous season, sometimes even if they appear in the current season.
The most annoying part has to be forgetting words. And it probably scares me the most. I think for most people this would seem like no big deal, but with my family history I have to admit it's starting to bother me a lot. My mom has MS, and my whole life she's had a really bad memory. So I automatically associate the two things. While MS is not hereditary, you are more likely to get it if your siblings or parents have it. My mother's brother also has it, and possibly even my mother's sister. So, it's certainly on my mind. However, with all of that said, I'm probably more worried about the fact that temporary memory loss is also associated with lupus. I've technically all but been diagnosed with this disease, but due to the nature of it, it's pretty difficult to pin down. It's a sort of "sister" disease to MS, but its also known to be a disease that mimics many of the symptoms of other diseases and therefore has a huge variety of symptoms. I do have a whole bunch of them, including the "butterfly rash" on my face which drives me crazy. But...I think my mom being so concerned about my health when I was young made me wary of going to the doctor about almost anything. I always feel like I'm being a total hypochrodriac. But with my memory obviously getting worse, I'm starting to wonder if I should rethink that.
Jul 15, 2009
killer tofu
urg...just found out that I can't get into Seneca for only one course. You have to enroll in the actual program. Sucks. I guess I'll have to look around for other colleges that offer a distance course...although for some reason I don't think I'm going to find one. I was really counting on this, as I think it would be the best prep I could have done, save maybe actually working in Robarts or something like that.
On the up side, so far I have gotten 2 out of 2 of the references I've asked for, which is awesome. I thought they were both going to say no, but it looks like I slightly underestimated them/myself. So that's great. Still worried about leaving the last one to this coming year.... :s But still, as usual me being anal about planning totally pays off in the end, and basically everyone else I know who's applying for grad school this or next year has barely started their application. If only I could get essays done this far in advance :P
well...off to finish an assignment....the apartment super is supposed to be coming in to the apartment today and I really want to be gone before she gets here as the place is a mess.
On the up side, so far I have gotten 2 out of 2 of the references I've asked for, which is awesome. I thought they were both going to say no, but it looks like I slightly underestimated them/myself. So that's great. Still worried about leaving the last one to this coming year.... :s But still, as usual me being anal about planning totally pays off in the end, and basically everyone else I know who's applying for grad school this or next year has barely started their application. If only I could get essays done this far in advance :P
well...off to finish an assignment....the apartment super is supposed to be coming in to the apartment today and I really want to be gone before she gets here as the place is a mess.
Jul 14, 2009
velut arbor aevo
A few days ago Zak and I did an architecture scavenger hunt for an assignment I had for class. It was pretty interesting, we went around basically the whole UofT campus, looking at architectural details that I had never noticed, despite being around these buildings for 4ish years now. And yesterday I went and basically did the whole thing over again because I forgot my camera the first time, and since we did it on the weekend we couldn't get in to the interiors.
The second time I went I decided to make it more of an adventure, so I ended up going through some weird doors and finding some pretty cool rooms.
Here's a picture of the Knox College garden, which I hope my Professor will agree is at least fairly picturesque.
This is a cool composite capital on Simcoe Hall
Really cool old classroom (there are actually two of them) in University College that we probably never use.
awesome staircase in UC that reminded me of the Gehry one at the AGO
This is the Great Hall in Hart House as seen from some totally weird castle thingy.
Outside of the weird castle thingy.
Room at the top of the castle thingy, which I am pretty certain I was not supposed to be in.
Jul 9, 2009
To be honest with you Diane, I am surprised.
So here's the deal. I really believe that the cultural world is absolutely done with Marxism. Ok, not right *now* we're not, but I believe we're in the twilight years. And, I have to say, I will not be sad to see it go.
The other day my Professor was going over architecture around the 1750's, and the central theme underlying basically all architecture at this time is a sort of decline, marked by a stagnation of creativity. All the buildings made in this period (with some exceptions of course) are in popular styles, but show no new traits, no progression. There are no real masterpieces, and no architect is really making strides. All of this, essentially, is how we can tell that the current popular ideology is waning and will soon be replaced with something else that at least seems less derivative. It all reminds me of what Stuart Hall once said about theory becoming what he called "fluent". Basically it's simple: Freud writes the Interpretation of Dreams. Then, a whole bunch of scholars take it up and begin interpreting cultural things like literature and paintings, and as they do this they develop a set of jargon terms. So, in this example, you'd get a lot of scholars using Freudian terms like "Oedipus Complex", "phallic", "the uncanny", and so on. Then, usually, at least one other big name comes out of that group, for this example lets go with Lacan. Then the cycle repeats and becomes more complicated, and a new group of scholars comes out that use both "fear of castration" as well as "lack" or "symbolic realm". Repeat this for 50 to 100 years and see what happens. I, and every other undergraduate student in the liberal arts (or what we should really now just call "cultural studies" and be done with it) knows what happens. You get someone like Briony Fer, whose book me and my friends were required to read for a Fine Art History course about abstract art. Essentially she draws absolutely everything back to two guys: Freud, and Lacan. And this book was written only a few years ago, when we are supposed to be oh-so-much better than those horrible Modernists who believed in the author as hero (another funny thing about this is that, as Harold Bloom pointed out back in the 80's, at least modernists could make reasoned value judgements. Now you have to accept everyone and everything no matter how crappy they are...yeah, not being able to critique bad writers is really going to lead to good things...). She throws around these jargon terms I'm talking about so much that you really can't help but sit back and let it all wash over you, all the while wondering whether she "wants a cracker", if you see my meaning. But the bad thing is, is that you're not wondering much else. Freud writes something half-original, then Lacan takes it up, fast-forward a few decades and scholars like Fer are parroting it back at undergraduates, and the cycle of hegemonic ideology repeats.
So, what does this have to do with Marxism? Well, first off, all of the names mentioned above (even Harold Bloom, the poor chap, although eventually he got out of this particular quagmire) are highly influenced by what Marx wrote. Secondly, all of the above are the details of what is going on within a larger cultural discourse in which Marxism is the umbrella ideology. Sooooo...if all of these terms are so accepted that undergraduates have to stifle a yawn when they read them...you know something is up. Marxist cultural theory is just *begging* us to refute it by any means possible at this point. Because really, how much longer can we keep talking about "alienation" from the products of our labour when we know nothing else? Have you ever met anyone who's said to you "gee, I really wish I could start milling my own corn and...shoe-ing...my own shoes again, I really miss that"...and, if you have, did you believe them? Or, better yet, if you have said that, did you even believe yourself? Can we honestly sit around today and believe that it is possible, today, to go to a way of life that is unglobalized? Without international corporations? Can we honestly, today, say that that is a possibility for the future? Keeping in mind that you are, right now, on the internet?
No, you can't. It wasn't a very good idea when Marx first had it, but it is a completely outdated idea today. It simply does not fit in the world we live in. As Marx himself once said in a different context, it "weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living". His theory was for a different world entirely, and it is time to buck up and pick another one to take its place, or modify it greatly. If we don't, we will be stuck in the same rut for who knows how long, never progressing, only repeating again and again what is told to us by scholars that have come before us. No "original" idea, no truly new forms can possibly arrise out of the current hole in the ground that is contemporary academics. I personally believe that a number of the high art world's artists have realised this, and it leads me to a strange and highly circuitous appreciation of their work. For example, I used to despise, with a great passion, the work of Damien Hirst. Now, however, I believe that just as Duchamp and Warhol did before him, Hirst is making art that makes fun of us all for our own lack of creativity. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I truly think we could all learn a little something from Mr. Hirst. Other than how to blow 200 million dollars, I mean.
The other day my Professor was going over architecture around the 1750's, and the central theme underlying basically all architecture at this time is a sort of decline, marked by a stagnation of creativity. All the buildings made in this period (with some exceptions of course) are in popular styles, but show no new traits, no progression. There are no real masterpieces, and no architect is really making strides. All of this, essentially, is how we can tell that the current popular ideology is waning and will soon be replaced with something else that at least seems less derivative. It all reminds me of what Stuart Hall once said about theory becoming what he called "fluent". Basically it's simple: Freud writes the Interpretation of Dreams. Then, a whole bunch of scholars take it up and begin interpreting cultural things like literature and paintings, and as they do this they develop a set of jargon terms. So, in this example, you'd get a lot of scholars using Freudian terms like "Oedipus Complex", "phallic", "the uncanny", and so on. Then, usually, at least one other big name comes out of that group, for this example lets go with Lacan. Then the cycle repeats and becomes more complicated, and a new group of scholars comes out that use both "fear of castration" as well as "lack" or "symbolic realm". Repeat this for 50 to 100 years and see what happens. I, and every other undergraduate student in the liberal arts (or what we should really now just call "cultural studies" and be done with it) knows what happens. You get someone like Briony Fer, whose book me and my friends were required to read for a Fine Art History course about abstract art. Essentially she draws absolutely everything back to two guys: Freud, and Lacan. And this book was written only a few years ago, when we are supposed to be oh-so-much better than those horrible Modernists who believed in the author as hero (another funny thing about this is that, as Harold Bloom pointed out back in the 80's, at least modernists could make reasoned value judgements. Now you have to accept everyone and everything no matter how crappy they are...yeah, not being able to critique bad writers is really going to lead to good things...). She throws around these jargon terms I'm talking about so much that you really can't help but sit back and let it all wash over you, all the while wondering whether she "wants a cracker", if you see my meaning. But the bad thing is, is that you're not wondering much else. Freud writes something half-original, then Lacan takes it up, fast-forward a few decades and scholars like Fer are parroting it back at undergraduates, and the cycle of hegemonic ideology repeats.
So, what does this have to do with Marxism? Well, first off, all of the names mentioned above (even Harold Bloom, the poor chap, although eventually he got out of this particular quagmire) are highly influenced by what Marx wrote. Secondly, all of the above are the details of what is going on within a larger cultural discourse in which Marxism is the umbrella ideology. Sooooo...if all of these terms are so accepted that undergraduates have to stifle a yawn when they read them...you know something is up. Marxist cultural theory is just *begging* us to refute it by any means possible at this point. Because really, how much longer can we keep talking about "alienation" from the products of our labour when we know nothing else? Have you ever met anyone who's said to you "gee, I really wish I could start milling my own corn and...shoe-ing...my own shoes again, I really miss that"...and, if you have, did you believe them? Or, better yet, if you have said that, did you even believe yourself? Can we honestly sit around today and believe that it is possible, today, to go to a way of life that is unglobalized? Without international corporations? Can we honestly, today, say that that is a possibility for the future? Keeping in mind that you are, right now, on the internet?
No, you can't. It wasn't a very good idea when Marx first had it, but it is a completely outdated idea today. It simply does not fit in the world we live in. As Marx himself once said in a different context, it "weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living". His theory was for a different world entirely, and it is time to buck up and pick another one to take its place, or modify it greatly. If we don't, we will be stuck in the same rut for who knows how long, never progressing, only repeating again and again what is told to us by scholars that have come before us. No "original" idea, no truly new forms can possibly arrise out of the current hole in the ground that is contemporary academics. I personally believe that a number of the high art world's artists have realised this, and it leads me to a strange and highly circuitous appreciation of their work. For example, I used to despise, with a great passion, the work of Damien Hirst. Now, however, I believe that just as Duchamp and Warhol did before him, Hirst is making art that makes fun of us all for our own lack of creativity. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I truly think we could all learn a little something from Mr. Hirst. Other than how to blow 200 million dollars, I mean.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
